In the first weeks after appearance of the book it was for me above all stretching to pursue the different feedbacks at different places in the net.
A very direct form of the feedback offers Amazon with sales rank - for the moment straight stands it on rank ~30,000, it however at the beginning of sale times up to rank 3,010 had temporarily high-snapped.
Besides it is stretching that now gradually the â€śAmazon neighborhoodâ€? crystallizes, thus the books, which were bought in combination with mine. In the meantime I appear there in illustrer society of e.g. Yochai Benkler and Clay Shirky, in addition, of Sascha Lobo.
Another kind of feedback came over Twitter, i.e. from humans, who the book ordered or already received. Over the Facebook Fanseite as well as via mail came also some further referring to error (best thanks!), which I took up to the Errata side. From the publishing house I finally know that a set from inquiries to review copies were already received.
In the coming weeks it will therefore possibly give the first somewhat detailed reactions and discussions. I look forward to it!
The complete book will appear on 18.9., but already today there are first views:
- A read sample with table of contents, introduction as well as two chapter summaries (to personal publicnesses and to information management).
- The list of the sources of on-line from the bibliography as URLographie.
Again scarcely two months break since the last Blogbeitrag - above all, because I wanted to rather put the available time into the work on the book instead of in the Bloggen. And even if - which was because of each quantity of other obligations, not least the completion of the manuscript for the book were slowly, very slowly in front to â€śyoung people and Web 2,0 â€ł - project - is nevertheless now really an end in view. With the UVK publishing house I agreed that early the manuscript is appropriate for coming Monday on the desk of my lector. In the remaining days still some polishing is announced, under it:
- The detailed correction passage by the whole document lock.
- Examine, which in last minute of the essays and studies emerged (e.g. the current pool of broadcasting corporations/Second Channel of German Television on-line study) still into the text must.
- The bibliography again for internal formatting consistency examine.
- Hyphenation and page breaks insert.
- Into .pdf convert, expressions, a last mark draufschauen, send and then.
By the way not only the foreseeable end of the book project is motivating, but also the information that there are already about 70 Vorbestellungen for the bookâ€¦. and I would like to let 70 people wait reluctantly still longer.
While I am thereby, the essay piles to process (thus: to examine and decide which into the text it must, which should into a footnote and which can be omitted), me noticed that the book is listed with Amazon in the meantime (and concomitantly book in advancable). In the short description only this weblog is not mentioned, what makes me happy much, but also still another nice sentence contain, which refers to the forerunner book to weblogâ€¦
The last weeks was it here in the blog very calm - it was because of the fact that I had not worked as at all as well on the manuscript. At the beginning of of December 2008 colleagues and I have very at short notice the order for an expert's assessment received, at the beginning of the week were due, so that I was rather clamped beside the remaining everyday life business. Thematically there were no particularly large overlaps with the book, which has however the advantage that I have now correctly desire to come and the Papierstapel down work finally in front, which pile up themselves beside me in the shelves. Stupid way are also again relatively carved up the coming one and a half weeks, but in the second February half it looks then somewhat calmer.
A consequence of these circumstances: With sighted the term for filing of the manuscript to the publishing house (at the end of of February) it does not become anything; there at the end of March a further larger institute project (â€? young person and Web 2,0 â€ś) to be final must, it at the end of of April will become supposed. However we plan to keep e.g. the conclusion publication of the project complementary in certain way to my Monographie (in order does not double the general bases and findings to the Web 2,0 to note). I have thus a strong incentive, then for becoming also really rapidly finishedâ€¦.
Forwards, during and after the AdHoc group of â€śon-line Datingâ€? at the DGS congress I thought about how one could systematize the different variants of network platforms. From the belly I have profiles at the beginning of Dating platforms as a special case of network platforms understood, finally put on members there also and to communicate with other users. In both cases a challenge of the identity management consists to enter aspects of the own person to written and/or into the profile. This happens besides in both cases against the background leader maintenance â€śauthenticityâ€?, i.e. Fakes are valid in all rule as deviating behavior - even if it becomes tricky regarding the question, where idealizing the own person auffhĂ¶rt and where the Faken anfĂ¤ngt1.
The differences begin however already with the motives for use, which are present individually and collectively to AdĂ¤quanzregeln consolidate themselves (â€? to which a certain platform is particularly well suitable? â€?): With network platforms the relations care is the center of attention; the dominating motive is to keep the contact to friends and acquaintance and/or to find old acquaintance again. That does not exclude that humans attach over studiVZ or Facebook new contacts, but it is not the dominating motive for use and/or not the leading Erwartung.2. With on-line Dating it is against it the explained goal, new humans knows to learn - knowing (learn) outside of the Internet is here not a condition, but consequence of the relations management.
In order to support these different goals, also the software code is differently arranged: Differences express themselves on the one hand in the refinement of the necessary profile information - above all however in the kind, how is gone around with the attached social relations. For network platforms it is konstitutiv3 that the own contacts are made visible and navigatable. Visitors of my profile can thus see, which ranks other user I among my friends/contacts, and can their profile sides click. Facebook or XING offer the option to suppress the announcement of the friend list; one seems nevertheless to expect from a â€śnormalâ€? profile to that one can see the respective network.
For users of Dating platforms such functions would be high-grade problematic and conflict-laden against it - users with many confirmed â€ścontactsâ€? (potenzielle or realized DATEs) came probably rapidly into the call, promisk, to be desperately or both; something similar is probably valid, if it became recognizable that one maintains parallel several interactions. The relations network is not made visible therefore for the profile visitor on a Dating platform; perceptibly the kommunikative dyad is only, and these also only for the persons involved.
One could differentiate now appropriate platforms along the two characteristics â€śpredominating motive for useâ€? and â€śvisibility from Ego networksâ€?; by simple cross scheduling I come on the following variants:
The distinction of boyd/Ellison network platforms would be following then â€śsocial network of sitesâ€?, contact contacts would be â€śsocial networking sitesâ€?. But which one could select as generic term for these applications? On-line Communities is often used at present, enclosure m.E in addition, forums or the like. And for the field â€ścare of existing relations - network visiblyâ€? does not occur to me for the moment no example. Is there one there?
- Ellison/Heino/Gibbs sat down apart thereby in an JCMC essay. [â†©]
- boyd/Ellison select therefore also consciously the designation â€śsocial NETWORK siteâ€? and not â€śsocial networkING siteâ€?. [â†©]
- With boyd/Ellison it is put on e.g. also in the definition [â†©]
[Like the life plays in such a way: Beginning of past week gave my three years old up notebook the spirit, why I the past days above all thereby zubrachte, a new computer for my work needs to adapt and the old data to secure and/or transmit. So slowly everything runs again, and I can turn to other things.]
In one of the first chapters of the book I will argue with the term â€śWeb 2,0 â€ł and different alternative and/or complementary concepts like â€śSocial softwareâ€?, â€śSocial Webâ€? or â€śSocial Mediaâ€?. The cryptotext for Web 2,0 is certainly Tim O' Reillys essay â€śWhat is Web 2,0â€? from 2005, which describes different principles and characteristics of the new net and of older characteristics and defines uses. When gathering different other texts and definitions I regarded also times the German-language Wikipedia article to look in particular in order when and how the first draft looked. Here screen SHOT of the all first â€śStubâ€?, which was set on 12.10.2005 (about two weeks after publication of the O' Reilly essay); with certain truth it means there: â€śWeb 2,0 should be the future of the World Wide Web.â€?
Only a half hour later had been revision-needily marked the article of another user than.
Nearly three years and over 1.000 changes the article looks later in such a way:
As it is right itself for a blog, as entrance a small personal history.
Already for a long time it was clear me that it is at the time to tackle a new book. The Web log I had finished at the beginning of of 2006; at the time I had already begun with the work in the DFG project â€śpractices on-line of the net workingâ€?, in which I me with blog and network platforms busy. I had thereby the opportunity to pursue the rapid development approximately around Social software/Web 2.0/Social Web [INSERT your cipher here] in an interesting double role as a participating scientific observer. Collected itself slowly, but reliably sea-honor much material on own empirical research, above all however relevant literature -, which I could process in lectures and essays, who almost cried in addition, thereafter, in a connected longer text to be discussed. Initially I still thought of an actualization and/or a new edition of the Web log, but soon it became clear me that the framework of this text me would probably not be sufficient; in addition it falls me unbelievably heavily, a once finished and/or â€śpolishedâ€? text to take again apart and convert.
The change from Bamberg to Hamburg to the Hans Bredow institute at the end of of 2007 provided on the one hand a whole set of new tasks and projects, on the other hand in addition, a work surrounding field, for me in which I can take a new book project in attack. After I pushed notes and arrangement ideas in the spring and summer always times again in my head (and in a Tiddly Wiki on my Desktop) back and forth, it was in August finally so far: I inquired Ruediger Steiner, the responsible lector with the UVK publishing house whether interest in a renewed co-operation would exist. In time one could say Just, because one was busy straight at the composition of the spring program there. I arranged a Expose and the draft of an arrangement, which in the conference of program one discussed and positively one took up. With the signing of an author-publisher contract it became thus official that I will work in the coming months on the fact that in the spring 2009 a book can appear on behalf of â€śthe new netâ€?.
Interestingly enough is one of the first official acts for the authors of a book still which can be written to write a short summary which is used in the announcements of the publishing house. Here thus in all shortness, for which it will go in the book (a version somewhat in more detail, which originates from the Expose mentioned above, is here):
The key word â€žWeb 2,0 â€śsummarizes different applications, practices and principles of Internet-based communication. Common it is to be published them that technical hurdles sink, in order texts, photos or videos, in addition, personal information in the Internet and to be maintained or attached social relations with other persons again. Optimistic voices stress the potentials for economics, politics and society, while sceptics before a fragmenting of publicnesses and giving up the privacy warn. The book discusses the current conditions of the research to on-line identity, relationship and information management with the help of a practice-theoretical analysis framework, in order to help to identify the actually new at â€žthe new net â€ś.
Now is the letter of a book already a time-consuming affair, why then still another weblog, which possibly takes valuable time up? Whereupon there are several answers.
The first answer is the fact that I could experience in the past years at the own body how the new net generally and weblog in the special one also changes the work of a scientist. And, for autumn 2007, â€śSchmidt with Deteâ€? offered the â€śBamblogâ€? to me and offer possibilities, my own thoughts and ideas with interested persons to divide. My work (and always times again also my spare time) was uncommonly enriched by the fact that I mean own personal public possessed. For a book, which concerns itself among other things with exactly this phenomenon, it is thus actually an inevitable step to be represented in Web log form also in the new net.
The second answer is that I do not know exactly yet at all for the moment, where this book-accompanying blog will develop. Possibly I present individual facts or arguments for discussion, possibly use I it here during the write process to swear in order over the letter to actually reflect (and), possibly use I it in addition, only after the publication of the book, in order to accompany the reception. A little will depend it probably also on the resonance, which I get in the coming weeks here: Which aspects of topic and writing of the book particularly interest THEM?
Here will somewhat do shortly; the contributions to the Workshop â€śthe new netâ€? are after http://www.talkingblogging.com/workshop2007/ shifted and here deleted.